首页> 外文OA文献 >18F-FDG PET/CT role in staging of gastric carcinomas: comparison with conventional contrast enhancement computed tomography
【2h】

18F-FDG PET/CT role in staging of gastric carcinomas: comparison with conventional contrast enhancement computed tomography

机译:18F-FDG PET / CT在胃癌分期中的作用:与常规对比增强计算机断层扫描的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of the report was to evaluate the role of fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-FDG PET/CT) in staging gastric cancer comparing it with contrast enhancement computed tomography (CECT).This retrospective study included 45 patients who underwent performed whole body CECT and F-FDG PET/CT before any treatment. We calculated CECT and F-FDG PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) for gastric, lymphnode, and distant localizations; furthermore, we compared the 2 techniques by McNemar test. The role of F-FDG PET/CT semiquantitative parameters in relation to histotype, grading, and site of gastric lesions were evaluated by ANOVA test.Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of CECT, and F-FDG PET/CT for gastric lesion were, respectively, 92.11%, 57.14%, 86.66%, 92.11%, 57.14% and 81.58%, 85.71%, 82.22%, 96.88%, 46.15%. No differences were identified between the 2 techniques about sensitivity and specificity. No statistical differences were observed between PET parameters and histotype, grading, and site of gastric lesion. The results of CECT and F-FDG PET/CT about lymphnode involvement were 70.83%, 61.90%, 66.66%, 68%, 65% and 58.33%, 95.24%, 75.55%, 93.33%, 66.67%. The results of CECT and F-FDG PET/CT about distant metastases were 80%, 62.86%, 66.66%, 38.10%, 91.67% and 60%, 88.57%, 82.22%, 60%, 88.57%. FDG PET/CT specificity was significantly higher both for lymphnode and distant metastases.The F-FDG PET/CT is a useful tool for the evaluation of gastric carcinoma to detect primary lesion, lymphnode, and distant metastases using 1 single image whole-body technique. Integration of CECT with F-FDG PET/CT permits a more valid staging in these patients.
机译:该报告的目的是评估氟18氟-2-氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(F-FDG PET / CT)在胃癌分期中与对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)相比的作用。 )。这项回顾性研究包括45例在接受任何治疗之前均进行了全身CECT和F-FDG PET / CT手术的患者。我们计算了CECT和F-FDG PET / CT对胃,淋巴结和远处定位的敏感性,特异性,准确性,阳性和阴性预测值(PPV和NPV);此外,我们通过McNemar测试比较了这两种技术。通过ANOVA测试评估F-FDG PET / CT半定量参数与胃病变的组织学类型,分级和部位的关系.CECT的敏感性,特异性,准确性,PPV和NPV以及F-FDG PET / CT对胃的敏感性病变分别为92.11%,57.14%,86.66%,92.11%,57.14%和81.58%,85.71%,82.22%,96.88%,46.15%。两种技术在敏感性和特异性方面均未发现差异。 PET参数与组织学类型,分级和胃病变部位之间未观察到统计学差异。 CECT和F-FDG PET / CT的淋巴结受累结果分别为70.83%,61.90%,66.66%,68%,65%和58.33%,95.24%,75.5%,93.33%,66.67%。 CECT和F-FDG PET / CT远处转移的结果分别为80%,62.86%,66.66%,38.10%,91.67%和60%,88.57%,82.22%,60%,88.57%。 FDG PET / CT对淋巴结和远处转移的特异性均显着更高.F-FDG PET / CT是一种评估胃癌的有用工具,可通过1个单一图像全身技术检测原发灶,淋巴结和远处转移。 CECT与F-FDG PET / CT的整合可在这些患者中进行更有效的分期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号